Late Gravettian lithic finds from Felsőtárkány-Peskő Cave, Northern Hungary
Kristóf István Szegedi
Hungarian National Museum, Hungarian National Museum Public Collection Centre; Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of Miskolc. Email: szegedi.kristof@hnm.hu, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-2891
Tibor Marton
Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Research Network. Email: marton.tibor@abtk.hu, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-2001
György Lengyel
Hungarian National Museum; Hungarian National Museum Public Collection Centre; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Miskolc. Email: lengyel.gyorgy@hnm.hu, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7803-3043
Cite as: Szegedi, K. I., Marton, T. & Lengyel, Gy. (2024) ‘Late Gravettian lithic finds from Felsőtárkány-Peskő Cave, Northern Hungary’, Litikum – Journal of the Lithic Research Roundtable, 12, pp. 69–75. https://doi.org/10.23898/litikuma0042
Abstract: Peskő Cave near Felsőtárkány (North Hungarian Mountains) is known for its Early Upper Palaeolithic bone industry found in the lower layer of its sediments in the early 20th century. Besides the points, a small amount of lithics were found in the Pleistocene stratum. Two archaeological horizons were identified. The lower two layers were classified as Aurignacian and the upper two ones Magdalénian. The Aurignacian included a few retouched blades, while the Magdalénian was never published. In the second half of the 20th century, the Magdalénian was reclassified as ‘Pilisszántó culture’ or ‘Cave Gravettian’, dated to the Late Glacial period. After the replacement of ‘Pilisszántó culture’ with the term Epigravettian in the 1980s the ‘Magdalénian’ layer of Peskő Cave fell out of research focus. Our research found that the automatic conversion of Pilisszántó culture finds to Epigravettian did not work and the finds at Peskő belong to the Late Gravettian.
Keywords: cave site, Late Gravettian, Gravette point, shouldered point
Data availability statement: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Disclosure statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding statement: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and the publication of this article: This work was supported by Hungarian National Museum Public Collection Centre’s ‘Man and Environment – Environmental Archaeology Research Programme’ [405336] and the Hungarian Research Network’s Institute of Archaeology.
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International Public License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and transform the material, under the following terms: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Literature Cited
Béres, S., Cserpák, F., Moskal-del Hoyo, M., Repiszky, T., Sázelová, S., Wilczyński, J., Lengyel, Gy. (2021) ‘Zöld Cave and the Late Epigravettian in Eastern Central Europe’, Quaternary International, 587–588, pp. 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.09.050
Bronk Ramsey, C. (2009) ‘Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates’, Radiocarbon, 51(1), pp. 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865
Chu, W., Kaminská, Ľ., Klasen, N., Zeeden, C., Lengyel, Gy. (2020) ‘The Chronostratigraphy of the Aurignacian in the Northern Carpathian Basin Based on New Chronometric/Archaeological Data from Seňa I (Eastern Slovakia)’, Journal of Palaeolithic Archaeology, 3, pp. 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-019-00044-2
Davies, W., Hedges, R. (2008–2009) ‘Dating a type site: Fitting Szeleta cave into its regional chronometric context’, Praehistoria, 9–10, pp. 35–45.
Dobosi, T. D. V., Holl, B. (2013) ‘A gravetti telepek topográfiája’, Litikum, 1, pp. 73–88. https://doi.org/10.23898/litikuma0006
Dobosi, T. D. V., Vörös, I. (1987) ‘The Pilisszántó I. Rock-shelter revision’, Folia Archaeologica, 38, pp. 7–64.
Éhik, Gy. (1914) ‘A borsodmegyei Peskő-barlang pleistocaen faunája’, Barlangkutatás, 2(4), pp. 191–199.
Fischer, A., Hansen, P. V., Rasmussen, P. (1984) ‘Macro and Micro Wear Traces on Lithic Projectile Points’, Journal of Danish Archaeology, 3, pp. 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/0108464X.1984.10589910
Gutay, M., Gasparik, M. (2019) ‘A Pes-kő barlang leletmentő feltárása’, Agria, 52, pp. 7–25.
Hillebrand, J. (1913) ‘A pleistocaen ősember ujabb nyomai hazánkban’, Barlangkutatás, 1(1), pp. 19–25.
Hír, J. (1991) ‘Rétegazonosító ásatás a Pes-kő-barlangban’, Folia Historico-Naturalia Musei Matraensis, 16, pp. 5–12.
Hopkins, R. J. A. (2018) A Matter of Time – Towards an absolute chronology for the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic biocultural shift along the Danube fluvial corridor. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:70820534-c062-425e-96d5-21caae65dd5b (Accessed: 21 August 2024)
Hromadová, B., Nemergut, A., Klaric, L., Ábelová, M. M., Vlačiky, M. (2021) ‘Výsledky revízneho výskumu mladopaleolitickej lokality v Moravanoch nad Váhom-Podkovici (Slovenská republika)’, Přehled výzkumů, 62(1), pp. 11–28. https://doi.org/10.47382/pv0621-07
Jánossy, D. (1979) A magyarországi pleisztocén tagolása gerinces faunák alapján. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kadič, O. (1944) ‘Az északnyugati Bükk barlangjai’, Barlangkutatás, 17(1), pp. 1–111.
Kaminská, Ľ., Kozłowski, J. K. (2011) ‘Nitra I-Čermáň v rámci štruktúry osídlenia gravettienskej kultúry na Slovensku’, Slovenská Archeológia, 59(1), pp. 1–85.
Lengyel, Gy. (2016) ‘Reassessing the Middle and Late Upper Palaeolithic in Hungary’, Acta Archaeologica Carpathica, 51, pp. 47–56.
Lengyel, Gy. (2018) ‘Lithic analysis of the Middle and Late Upper Palaeolithic in Hungary’, Folia Quaternaria, 86, pp. 5–157. https://doi.org/10.4467/21995923FQ.18.001.9819
Lengyel, Gy., Mester, Zs., Szolyák, P. (2015) ‘The Late Gravettian and Szeleta Cave, northeast Hungary’, Quaternary International, 406, pp. 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.09.014
Lengyel, Gy., Wilczyński, J. (2018) ‘The Gravettian and the Epigravettian chronology in Eastern Central Europe: A comment on Bösken et al. (2017)’, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 506, pp. 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.11.017
Markó, A., Biller, A. Zs. (2023) ‘Csak ló legyen és rén… Epigravetti korú lelőhelyek a tájban a Dunántúl északkeleti részén’, in M. Tóth Farkas, G. Szilas, A. Anders, G. Kalla, V. Kiss, G. Kulcsár & Zs. Mester (eds.) MΩMOΣ XI. Őskoros Kutatók Összejövetele. Környezet és ember. A BTM Aquincumi Múzeumban 2019. április 10–12-én megrendezett konferencia tanulmánykötete. Budapest: Budapesti Történeti Múzeum, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Régészeti Intézet, Ősrégészeti Társaság, pp. 231–243. https://doi.org/10.21862/momosz11.17
Pryor, A. J. E., Nesnídalová, T., Šida, P., Lengyel, G., Standish, C. D., Milton, J. A., Cooper, M. J., Hambach, B., Crowley, J., Wilczyński, J. (2024) ‘Reindeer prey mobility and seasonal hunting strategies in the late Gravettian mammoth steppe’, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 16, 123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-02019-z
Reimer, P.J., Austin, W. E. N., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Blackwell, P. G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Butzin, M., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M.m Grootes, P. M., Guilderson, T. P., Hajdas, I., Heaton, T. J., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Kromer, B., Manning, S. W., Muscheler, R., Palmer, J. G., Pearson, C., van der Plicht, J., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D. A., Scott, E. M., Southon, J. R., Turney, C. S. M., Wacker, L., Adolphi, F., Büntgen, U., Capano, M., Fahrni, S. M., Fogtmann-Schulz, A., Friedrich, R., Köhler, P., Kudsk, S., Miyake, F., Olsen, J., Reinig, F., Sakamoto, M., Sookdeo, A., Talamo, S. (2020) ‘The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP)’, Radiocarbon, 62(4), pp. 725–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41
Serwatka, K. (2018) ‘What’s Your Point? Flexible Projectile Weapon System in the Central European Final Palaeolithic. The Case of Swiderian Points’, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 17, pp. 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.10.048
Simán, K. (1989) ‘Hidasnémeti – Upper Palaeolithic site in the Hernád Valley (Northeast Hungary)’, Acta Archaeologica Carpathica, 28, pp. 5–24.
Szegedi, K. I., Marton, T., Lengyel, Gy. (2023) ‘The ‘Epipalaeolithic’ site Hont–Templomdomb of Northern Hungary revisited’, Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae, 2023, pp. 9–22. https://doi.org/10.54640/CAH.2023.9
Vértes, L., Jánossy, D., Hermann, M., Stieber, J. (1956) ‘Ausgrabungen in der Petényi- und Pesko-Höhle (Bükk-Gebirge)’, Folia Archaeologica, 8, pp. 3–22.
Vértes, L. (1965) Az őskőkor és az átmeneti kőkor emlékei Magyarországon. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Vogel, J. C., Waterbolk, H. T. (1972) Radiocarbon, 14(1), pp. 6–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200001016
Wilczyński, J. (2016) ‘Variability of Late Gravettian lithic industries in southern Poland: A case study of the Krakow Spadzista and Jaksice II sites’, Quaternary International, 406, pp. 129–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.026
Wilczyński, J., Wojtal, P., Oliva, M., Sobczyk, K., Haynes, G., Klimowicz, J., Lengyel, Gy. (2019) ‘Mammoth hunting strategies during the Late Gravettian in Central Europe as determined from case studies of Milovice I (Czech Republic) and Kraków Spadzista (Poland)’, Quaternary Science Reviews, 223, 105919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105919
Wilczyński, J., Goslar, T., Wojtal, P., Oliva, M., Göhlich, U. B., Antl-Weiser, W., Šida, P., Verpoorte, A., Lengyel, Gy. (2020) ‘New radiocarbon dates for the Late Gravettian in Eastern Central Europe’, Radiocarbon, 62(1), pp. 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2019.111