The Demjén-Szőlő-hegy III Early Upper Palaeolithic Site

Sándor Béres†, Dalma Kerekes*

* Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 4/B Múzeum Krt., Budapest, 1088 Hungary; E-mail: kerekesdalma0214@gmail.com; ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3380-890X


Cite as: Béres, S., & Kerekes, D. (2023). The Demjén-Szőlő-hegy III Early Upper Palaeolithic Site. In A. Király (Ed.), From tea leaves to leaf-shaped tools. Studies in honour of Zsolt Mester on his sixtieth birthday (pp. 65–78). Lithic Research Roundtable & Institute of Archaeological Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. https://doi.org/10.23898/litikumsi02a03

Abstract: Szőlő-hegy is located in Northeastern Hungary in the vicinity of Demjén. The archaeological potential of the plateau has been discovered by Viola Dobosi in 1975. However, the Szőlő-hegy III site was only identified during a field survey in 2017.

The main goal of the article is to determine the period and the cultural attribution of the finds by comparing the assemblage with similar archaeological materials. Therefore, a comprehensive technological and typological analysis was carried out. According to the comparison with the Szőlő-hegy I and II sites, Szőlő-hegy III is classified as Aurignacian. The archaeological material contains tool types characteristic of Early and Typical Aurignacian, but their proportion, technology, and closest analogies might leave the possibility open to an Early Aurignacian origin.

Keywords: Aurignacian, Raw material economy, Technology, Typology

Data availability statement: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Disclosure statement: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Funding statement: The author received no financial support for the research and/or the publication of this article.

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International Public License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and transform the material, under the following terms: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Creative Commons License


Literature cited

Adams, B. (1998). The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in Central Europe. The record from the Bükk Mountain region. Archaeopress. https://doi.org/10.30861/9780860548775

Davies, W., & Hedges, R. (2008–2009). Dating a Type Site: Fitting Szeleta Cave into its Regional Chronometric Context. Praehistoria, 9–10, 35–45.

Demars, P.-Y., & Laurent, P. (1989). Types d’outils litiques du Paleolithique Supérieur en Europe. Presses du CNRS.

Demidenko, Y. E., & Noiret, P. (2012). The Siuren-I Aurignacian of krems-dufour type industries in the context of the European Aurignacian. In Y. E. Demidenko, M. Otte & P. Noiret (Eds.), Siuren I rock-shelter. From Late Middle Paleolithic and Early Upper Paleolithic to Epi-Paleolithic in Crimea (pp. 343–357). Presses Universitaires de Liège.

Dobosi, V. T. (1976). Prehistoric settlement at Demjén-Hegyeskő-bérc. Folia Archaeologica, 27, 9–40.

Dobosi, V. T. (2005). Cadastre of Palaeolithic finds in Hungary. State of art 2005. Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae, 2005, 49–81.

Hopkins, R. J. A. (2018). A Matter of time. Towards an absolute chronology for the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic biocultural shift along the Danube fluvial corridor [PhD dissertation)]. Oxford University.

Hublin, J.-J. (2015). The modern human colonization of western Eurasia: When and where? Quaternary Science Reviews, 118, 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.08.011

Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H., & Tixier, J. (1999). Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone: Followed by a Multilingual Vocabulary Arabic, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish. Cercle de Recherches et d’Etudes Préhistoriques.

Kaminská, L’., Škrdla, P., Kozłowski, J. K., & Tomášková, S. (2009). Nižný Hrabovec: A site with evolved Levallois technology in Eastern Slovakia. Eurasian Prehistory, 6(1–2), 57–64.

Kozłowski, J. K., & Mester, Zs. (2003–2004). Un nouveau site du paléolithique supérieur dans la région d’Eger (Nord-est de l’Hongrie). Praehistoria, 4–5, 109–140.

Kozłowski, J. K., Mester, Z., Zandler, K., Budek, A., Kalicki, T., Moskal, M., & Ringer, Á. (2009). Le Paléolithique moyen et supérieur de la Hongrie du nord: Nouvelles investigations dans la région d’Eger. L’Anthropologie, 113(2), 399–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2009.04.005

Kozłowski, J. K., Mester, Zs., Budek, A., Kalicki, T., Moskal-del Hoyo, M., Zandler, K., & Béres, S. (2012). La mise en valeur d’un ancien site éponyme: Eger-Kőporos dans le Paléolithique moyen et supérieur de la Hongrie du nord. L’Anthropologie, 116(3), 405–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2012.05.004

Lengyel, Gy., Béres, S., & Fodor, L. (2006). New lithic evidence of the Aurignacian in Hungary. Eurasian Prehistory, 4(1–2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30018-0_3167

Markó, A. (2015). Istállóskő revisited: lithic artefacts and assemblages, sixty years after. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 66(1), 5–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/072.2015.66.1.1

Mellars, P. (2004). Neanderthals and the modern human colonization of Europe. Nature432(25), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211082109

Mester, Zs. (2009). Nyersanyagbeszerzés és -feldolgozás egy felső paleolit telepen: Andornaktálya-Zúgó-dűlő. (Raw material acquisition and processing at an Upper Palaeolithic settlement: Andornaktálya–Zúgó-dűlő). In G. Ilon (Ed.), MΩMOΣ VI. – Őskoros Kutatók VI. Összejövetelének konferenciakötete. Nyersanyagok és kereskedelem. Kőszeg, 2009. március 19–21. (pp. 239–54). Vas megyei Múzeumok Igazgatósága.

Mester, Zs. (2010). Új paleolitkutatások Eger környékén. Gesta, 9, 40–54.

Mester, Zs., Kozłowski, J. K., Kalicki, T., Dobos, A., Frączek, M., Zandler, K., Gutay, M., Béres, S., & Cserpák, F. (2021). Nouveaux assemblages du Paléolithique supérieur ancien en Hongrie du nord dans le contexte de l’hypothèse du Couloir danubien – New assemblages of the Early Upper Paleolithic in Northern Hungary in the context of the Danube Corridor hypothesis. L’Anthropologie, 125(4), 102914. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.anthro.2021.102914

Nigst, P. R. (2006). The First Modern Humans in the Middle Danube Area? New Evidence from Willendorf II (Eastern Austria). In N. J. Conard (Ed.), When Neanderthals and Modern Humans met (pp. 269–304). Kerns Verlag.

Nigst, P. R., Haesaerts, P., Damblon, F., Frank-Fellner, C., Mallol, C., Viola, B., Götzinger, M., Niven, L., Trnka, G., & Hublin, J.-J. (2014). Early modern human settlement of Europe north of the Alps occurred 43,500 years ago in a cold steppe-type environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(40), 14394–14399. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412201111

Pathou-Mathis, M., Vercoutère, C., Lengyel, Gy., Szolyák, P., & Mester, Zs. (2016). New interpretation of the Upper Palaeolithic human occupations at Istállóskő Cave (Bükk Mountains, Hungary). Eurasian Prehistory, 13(1–2), 77–90.

Pelikán, P. (1986). The Mesozoic siliceous rock of the Bükk Mountains. In K. T. Biró, (Ed.), International Conference on Flint Mining and Lithic Raw Material Identification in the Carpathian Basin, Sümeg 1986 (1) (pp. 177–180). KMI Rota.

Pentelényi, L. (2002). A Bükkalja I. Földtani vázlat. In Cs. Baráz (Ed.), A Bükki Nemzeti Park. Hegyek, erdők, emberek (pp. 205–216). Bükki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság.

Plašienka, D. (2018). The Carpathian Clippen Belt and types of its klippen – an attempt at a genetic classification. Mineralia Slovaca, 50(1), 1–24.

De Sonneville-Bordes, D., & Perrot, J. (1953). Essai d’adaptation des méthods statistiques au Paléolithique supérieur. Premiers résultants. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 50(5–6), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1953.3059

Škrdla, P. (2017). Moravia at the Onset of the Upper Paleolithic. The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archaeology.

Sytnyk, O., Bogucki, A., & Łanczont, M. (2009). Deyaki aspekty syrovyny paleolitychnykh stoyanok Halytskoho Prydnister’ya. In J. Gancarski & A. Muzyczuk (Eds.), Surowce naturalne w Karpatach oraz ich wykorzystanie w pradziejach i wczesnym średniowieczu: Materiały z konferencji, Krosno 25-26 listopada 2008 r. (pp. 241–272). Muzeum Podkarpackie.

T. Biró, K. (1981). A kárpát-medencei obszidiánok vizsgálata. Archaeologiai Értesítő, 108, 198–205.

T. Biró, K., & T. Dobosi, V. (1991). Lithotheca – Comparative Raw Material Collection of the Hungarian Natoinale Museum. Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum.

Vértes, L. (1965). Az őskőkor és az átmeneti kőkor emlékei Magyarországon. Akadémiai Kiadó.

Voľanská, A. (2014). Gravettienske osidlenie polohy Bikoš II v Prešove. In M. Ološtiak (Ed.), 9. Študentská vedecká konferencia. Zborník plných príspevkov. Prešovská univerzita v Prešove.

Zandler, K. (2012). A paleolitikum kőiparai Eger környékén. Gesta, 11, 3–54.